Thoughts on Crash of US Airways Flight 1549

Alisa Brodkowitz
Alisa Brodkowitz
Contributor
Posted by Alisa BrodkowitzJanuary 15, 2009 8:25 PM

This afternoon US Airways Flight 1549 crashed into the Hudson River. As soon as I heard the news I began to think about another US Airways Flight that crashed in New York in 1992, with deadly consequences. It is truly miraculous that everyone survived the crash of Flight 1549. But now the questions begin.

Initial reports are stating that the pilot encountered a flock of geese. In aviation terms, this is known as a bird strike. The report states that the Airbus A320 hit a flock of geese and that birds were sucked into both engines, disabling them. In the coming months, here are several questions we will want answers to.

(1) We will want to know why birds were in the vicinity. Birds are a big problem at airports and airports spend considerable money scaring them away. Some airports use recorded predatory bird calls to deter them, others use hawks.

(2) We will want to know why air traffic control (or other pilots) did not alert the pilot to the birds prior to take off and whether they could have been detected by radar.

(3) We will want to know whether the birds damaged any other part of the aircraft, effecting its operation. For instance, if a bird strikes a controlled surface, like the leading edge of a wing or wings, the aircraft will lose lift or encounter asymmetric lift.

The National Transportation Safety Board is sending a 20 member team to investigate the crash. We will wait for their careful examination.

4 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Gary Andrews
Posted by Gary Andrews
January 15, 2009 9:01 PM

(1) US airports do not spend a lot of money on wildlife control ... as an example, DFW airport, the largest land area airport has only 1 wildlife control officer.

(2) controllers do not have time to interpret radar data ... any bird can detect birds but data is hard to interpret and require a very skilled radar ornithologist

We have specialized operational bird detection radar technology available though taht was developed by and is used by the USAF and NASA, but the US commercial aviation is behind ... airports in Europe and Canada are ahead of us in the US

Alisa Brodkowitz
Posted by Alisa Brodkowitz
January 15, 2009 10:38 PM

Gary,
Thanks for your comments. That is great information.
Alisa

Alisa Brodkowitz
Posted by Alisa Brodkowitz
January 15, 2009 10:49 PM

By the way, are you talking about The Avian Hazard Advisory System?

Jane Akre
Posted by Jane Akre
January 16, 2009 9:16 AM

Another thought -

Suppose the birds disabled one engine and the pilot mistakenly turned off the wrong one! What is the likelihood of birds being sucked into BOTH engines?! Pilots- can/does that happen?

Just one more thing to ponder as we hail the pilot as a hero- (PS- He clearly did a LOT of right things here!! )

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard King County

InjuryBoard King County RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address